Fix CODEOWNERS review request attribution using comment metadata (#36348)

Fixes #36333

## Problem

When CODEOWNERS automatically assigns reviewers to a pull request, the
timeline incorrectly shows the PR author as the one who requested the
review (e.g., "PR_AUTHOR requested review from CODE_OWNER"). This is
misleading since the action was triggered automatically by CODEOWNERS
rules, not by the PR author.

## Solution

Store CODEOWNERS attribution in comment metadata instead of changing the
doer user:
- Add `SpecialDoerName` field to `CommentMetaData` struct (value:
`"CODEOWNERS"` for CODEOWNERS-triggered requests)
- Pass `isCodeOwners=true` to `AddReviewRequest` and
`AddTeamReviewRequest` functions
- Template can check this metadata to show appropriate attribution
message

---------

Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Gregorius Bima Kharisma Wicaksana
2026-01-16 21:52:57 +07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 49edbbbc2e
commit 65422fde4d
14 changed files with 89 additions and 65 deletions
+4 -2
View File
@@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ func InsertReviews(ctx context.Context, reviews []*Review) error {
}
// AddReviewRequest add a review request from one reviewer
func AddReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer, doer *user_model.User) (*Comment, error) {
func AddReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer, doer *user_model.User, isCodeOwners bool) (*Comment, error) {
return db.WithTx2(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) (*Comment, error) {
sess := db.GetEngine(ctx)
@@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ func AddReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer, doer *user_mo
RemovedAssignee: false, // Use RemovedAssignee as !isRequest
AssigneeID: reviewer.ID, // Use AssigneeID as reviewer ID
ReviewID: review.ID,
SpecialDoerName: util.Iif(isCodeOwners, SpecialDoerNameCodeOwners, ""),
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err
@@ -767,7 +768,7 @@ func restoreLatestOfficialReview(ctx context.Context, issueID, reviewerID int64)
}
// AddTeamReviewRequest add a review request from one team
func AddTeamReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer *organization.Team, doer *user_model.User) (*Comment, error) {
func AddTeamReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer *organization.Team, doer *user_model.User, isCodeOwners bool) (*Comment, error) {
return db.WithTx2(ctx, func(ctx context.Context) (*Comment, error) {
review, err := GetTeamReviewerByIssueIDAndTeamID(ctx, issue.ID, reviewer.ID)
if err != nil && !IsErrReviewNotExist(err) {
@@ -812,6 +813,7 @@ func AddTeamReviewRequest(ctx context.Context, issue *Issue, reviewer *organizat
RemovedAssignee: false, // Use RemovedAssignee as !isRequest
AssigneeTeamID: reviewer.ID, // Use AssigneeTeamID as reviewer team ID
ReviewID: review.ID,
SpecialDoerName: util.Iif(isCodeOwners, SpecialDoerNameCodeOwners, ""),
})
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("CreateComment(): %w", err)